Monday, November 26, 2012

Two press releases teaching about the mysterious dark energy are published today:


The dark energy certainly does more than accelerate distant galaxies – still it is just a tiny 10-50 additional charge density in the Grid.

For viewers that want to dig deeper, I recommend the ToS Summary that also lists the support and proofs of the Theory of Something.

Here are a few pointers to the details discussed in the above releases (into the Theory of Something):
ToS section 3: The Grid of Charge particles
ToS section 3.1.1: The Photon and Planck’s Constant Showing Up
ToS section 4.3: The Mass of Particles and Generation of Gravity
ToS section 5: Dark Energy, F=ma and the Gravity Law
ToS section 6.1: Tying Cosmology to the Quantum World – Planck’s Constant and the Revised View on Mass (See also the Introduction above.)

A popular question is still whether I have confused Weight and Mass, which is best addressed at the previousblog entry. The ToS proves that they are equal, by deriving both F=ma and the gravity law from electricity. Newton’s fundamental mechanical laws of physics are not fundamental anymore – They are derived from electricity, which is the fundamental law of physics!


  1. Question: What's between the nodes? Some type of foam?

  2. Between the Negtrinos there is nothing – stable nothing – because there are negtrinos around… Or one could argue that there are E- and B-fields there – but is that something? In school I was thought that you can measure E- and B-fields, but to do that you need to insert a test charge – and all you actually measure is force between charges. E- and B-fields can be seen as just something we introduced for mathematical convenience. Force between charges is the only thing we can measure.

    Look at the equations at There you see the E- and B-fields, but insert those expressions into the top equation – Lorentz force law – and E and B disappear totally! What is left is only force between moving point charges – a single equation for everything.

    You can actually have a “field”-perspective or an “action on a distance”-perspective. The equation of everything shows they are the same.

    So, exchange "foam" for "field" if you like – or be happy with nothing in between.

  3. hello, I'm incredibly happy to have found your work and enjoying reading what you have so far made available.

    sorry to be a bore and I hope this is of help and not annoyance. please search your document for the following to check if they are typos or not;

    particle/waye (Appears several times. Is waye correct?)

    This potential will decay as the university expands and matter will show less and less mass. University?

    generating en electron with its 9 negtrinos. En?

    back to reading :-)

    1. Thanks for your kind words and typos found. I’ve corrected my original, so they will be gone in next release. Please notify me when finding more! “expanding university” :-)

  4. we can hope that universities do expand with this idea :-D

    well, I read it. I wish my maths was stronger than it is. physics was my absolute favourite at school and my favourite thing to read to this day but a weakness in maths prevented me following that line. the theory, I love.

  5. this video at 30min:30sec ...

    anything theoryofsomething can say about that? I'd think so!

    1. That was cool :-) (CERN’s cryolab showing superconductive material flying in magnetic fields etc.)

      I think our findings and understanding of superconductivity is correct and goes well with the existence of the Grid filling up space. Actually the Grid is required for it!

      If space were “Nothing” instead of the Grid, we would not have magnetism as we know it. There would only be electrostatic forces – Coulombs law – and the CERN demonstration would fail.

      But, since, we have the “extended Coulombs law” – the Equation of Everything – describing magnetism also, making “Nothing” unstable. That results in negtrinos/postrinos showing up, forming the Grid and giving us both space and time!

      That is the Theory of Something finding and view (ToS 8.2). I encourage others to review and improve on that analysis!

  6. RE: The Photon

    Particle is not spelled correctly.

    I can imagine the negtrino not a rotating cylindrical particle. What I'm imagining is a spherical charged particle in a fixed position with its electrical poles moving diametrically from each other. I can also imagine a more stable Grid - a triangle is more stable than a square, a triangular prism is more stable that a cube. In my imagination, shapes take precedence over numbers.


Real Time Web Analytics